Good work Dalisay, but you also needed to do the questions at the bottom to find out which were the different countries at easy latitude and longitude.

The Traveler IQ challenge ranks geographic knowledge of cities such as: San Juan, Anaheim or Gatlinburg by comparing results against 6,034,638 other travelers.



Great work Dalisay, but number 9 of the countries is India , not South Africa.

Nice start

The Traveler IQ challenge ranks geographic knowledge of cities such as: Buenos Aires, Panama City or Wichita by comparing results against 6,047,872 other travelers.


MAP OF CODRINGTON:

map_of_codrington_final.jpg

MAP OF CODRINGTON (with key):
map_of_codrington_last.JPG



dalisay i think





Most of this is really good Dalisay. You have followed the instructions well. What you need to be certain of is that there is always a north sign and a scale in a map. Be careful to check all your spelling. You mix up where and were sometimes. Otherwise great.

Dalisay
1-2
3-4
5-6
7-8
D: Information provided by map
not always relevant
mostly relevant
relevant
always relevant
D: Audience/ Purpose i.e. is it suitable for a new student to find out about Barbados and Codrington.
unclear
occasionally unclear
Suited to audience
language, style, visuals always appropriate
B: Accuracy – Did you follow conventions with maps. – Border, Title, key, scale.
some evidence
errors in conventions
only occasional errors in conventions
conforming to all conventions





Alexander the Great:

A really excellent summary and analysis. A bit more needed on the however section though. 9/10.
Difficulty in placing video clips to location on map or time. Very simple summary, no specifics
Fairly accurate location of video clip either in place or time. Simplified summary with little specifics
Location of clips recognized and an idea of date shown.
Summary contains some accurate information
Able to clearly locate different places and show them on map that relate to clips.
A wide range of specific information given in the summary.
Very well annotated map showing exact location of video clips with date and specific events that occurred as backed up with a well written summary of events.
Explanation for reasons why Alexander was Great is minimal or absent. No specific information.
Lacking depth in analysis. Explanations are simple with few facts given to back up reason for Alexander’s Greatness
Satisfactory level of analysis showing supporting evidence from own section and others to give reasons for Alexander’s “Greatness”
Analysis of Greatness in greater detail with good evidence shown on most of the issues.
High level of analysis of idea of “great” – good reasons and excellent explanations with thorough evidence. Is aware of “however”.


For more files and assessment work, please check dropbox.


https://www.dropbox.com/sh/iqijzd00xs0o11d/0bnrUm825E